Last Seen Theory failed to prove that the deceased was with the accused at his last movement - Hair and Button said to be recovered and compared with that of Accused - Biochemical and immunological examinations include microscopic examination failed to prove that of the accused - Non sending the accused for medical examination when the accused was said to be received injuries in the hands of deceased at the time of strangulation of him - Trial court rightly acquitted the accused - 2015 A.P.(2014)MSKLAWREPORTS
Last Seen Theory failed to prove that the deceased was with the accused at his last movement - Hair and Button said to be recovered and compared with that of Accused - Biochemical and immunological examinations include microscopic examination failed to prove that of the accused - Non sending the accused for medical examination when the accused was said to be received injuries in the hands of deceased at the time of strangulation of him - Trial court rightly acquitted the accused - 2015 A.P.(2014)MSKLAWREPORTS There are no eye-witnesses to the occurrence. The entire case rests upon the circumstantial evidence. One circumstance pleaded by the prosecution is the theory of last seen. PW.4, maidservant of PW.1, is said to have seen the accused, taking the deceased with him at 11.30 A.M., from the terrace of the building. Though LW.6, a care taker-cum-auto driver of PW.1, is said to have seen the accused taking the deceased in front of the gate, he was not examined...